A claim
being made against the health care system that President Obama wishes to employ
for the United States is that it is unconstitutional for everyone to be forced
to get their own health care and pay for it. The issue with the health care market
is the existence of free-riders, which are not as large of a problem in any
other market. Some people will refuse to pay for any of their health care if it
is offered to them for free, which will damage the market. Even if there is
universal health care, where everyone gets coverage, the U.S. still wants
people to pay for extra coverage that the U.S. government does not deem
mandatory.
In
general, passing the current health care mandate could be a positive for the
free market of the economy, because everyone will be involved, and it will
hopefully be forced to thrive, and the only people who will be harmed are those
who were not paying for their health insurance in the first place. If the
mandate does not pass, the people who are harmed are the people who do pay for
their insurance and do not free ride on the current state of the system, as well
as the workers who lose compensation because of the free riders who are abusing
the system.
I think that this debate is very interesting and difficult to choose a side. We have to balance between morality and economic concerns. Healthcare is closely linked with people's quality of life and sometimes it determines whether a person will live or die.
ReplyDeleteI think there will always be a free rider issue if everybody is involved in health care
ReplyDelete